Key Takeaways
- Rank Math free includes 5 focus keywords, 20+ schema types, and redirects - Yoast free gives you 1 keyword and basic schema
- For agencies managing multiple sites, Rank Math Pro at ~$99/year unlimited beats Yoast Premium at $99 per site per year
- WooCommerce stores should consider Rank Math - Yoast charges over €178/year extra for WooCommerce SEO that Rank Math includes free
- Neither plugin improves rankings over the other - both validate on-page technical elements, ranking depends on your content
- Yoast has a genuine edge in readability analysis with Flesch Reading Ease scoring, useful for content teams wanting writing quality feedback
- Switching from Yoast to Rank Math is straightforward - Rank Math includes a one-click import wizard that migrates all existing metadata
Rank Math vs Yoast SEO: An Honest Comparison (From Someone Who Uses One)
Most Rank Math vs Yoast comparisons reach the same conclusion: Rank Math wins on features, Yoast wins on trust and readability. Most are also written by people who claim to have tested both thoroughly.
Here is a more honest framing: I have used Yoast for years across multiple WordPress sites. I have never used Rank Math. This article compares both based on the data - feature lists, pricing, performance benchmarks, and what the WordPress community consistently reports - while being transparent about where my direct experience ends.
The verdict is not what you might expect from that setup. Rank Math's free tier genuinely outperforms Yoast's free tier on almost every measurable dimension. And for agencies, WooCommerce sites, and anyone starting fresh, the data points to Rank Math. Where Yoast holds its own - and where I personally stay - is a narrower use case than most reviews admit.
Rank Math vs Yoast: At a Glance
| Feature | Rank Math (Free) | Yoast (Free) |
|---|---|---|
| Focus keywords | 5 | 1 |
| Schema types | 20+ | Basic only |
| Redirect manager | Included | Premium only |
| 404 monitoring | Included | Not available |
| Internal link suggestions | Included | Not available |
| GA4 integration | Included | Manual setup |
| Readability analysis | Basic | Advanced (Flesch score) |
| WooCommerce SEO | Basic free | Paid add-on |
| Active installs | 3M+ | 10M+ |
| Plugin file size | 2.85MB | 7.18MB |
At face value, Rank Math free is more generous. The comparison gets more nuanced once you factor in use case, team experience, and what premium tiers actually add.
Yoast, launched in 2010, remains the most installed SEO plugin in WordPress with over 10 million active sites. Rank Math arrived in 2018 with a more generous free tier and has grown to 3 million installs.
Free vs Free: Where the Gap Is Largest
The most important comparison for most users is free tier vs free tier, because the majority of WordPress sites run on the free version of whichever plugin they install.
Rank Math's free tier includes five focus keywords per page, 20+ schema types (Article, FAQ, HowTo, Recipe, Review, and more), a redirect manager, 404 monitoring, internal link suggestions, and GA4 analytics integration. This is a meaningfully complete SEO toolkit for most sites.
Yoast's free tier limits you to a single focus keyword, offers basic schema only (not the full library), excludes redirects entirely, and provides no analytics integration. To get redirects, multiple keywords, or advanced schema, you need Yoast Premium at $99 per site per year.
For someone starting a new WordPress site with no existing investment in either plugin, the free tier comparison strongly favors Rank Math. SEO plugins vary significantly in what they include for free - and this is one of the wider gaps in the category.
Feature Comparison: Where Each Plugin Wins
Schema Markup
Rank Math includes 20+ schema types in the free version. Yoast restricts the full schema library to Premium users. For content that benefits from rich results - FAQ pages, how-to guides, recipes, reviews, local business listings - Rank Math provides this capability at no cost.
If schema implementation is a priority and budget is a constraint, Rank Math is the clear choice. Both plugins handle the baseline Article and BreadcrumbList schema that most blog content needs.
Readability Analysis
Yoast's readability analysis is genuinely better. It uses Flesch Reading Ease scoring - a measurable, standardized metric - alongside passive voice detection, sentence length analysis, and transition word density checks. Rank Math offers basic content analysis but does not match Yoast's depth on readability.
For content teams that want structured feedback on writing quality alongside SEO checks, Yoast's readability layer is a real differentiator. It is the one area where I find Yoast's approach more useful in practice - the on-page SEO checklist I follow maps directly to what Yoast validates, and the readability checks are part of that workflow.
Analytics Integration
Rank Math connects to Google Analytics 4 and Google Search Console directly within the plugin dashboard, giving you keyword performance data, click-through rates, and impressions without leaving WordPress. Yoast requires you to set up GSC separately and does not include GA4 integration in the free version.
For site owners who want their SEO data centralized in WordPress rather than across multiple tabs, this is a practical advantage for Rank Math.
Redirect Manager
Rank Math includes a full redirect manager in the free version with support for 301, 302, 410, and regex redirects. Yoast's redirect manager is Premium-only. For sites that regularly update URLs, restructure content, or migrate from other platforms, having redirects included in the free tier is meaningful.
Content AI and Third-Party Integrations
Both plugins now offer AI-assisted content features, but they work differently. Rank Math's Content AI is a separate credit-based subscription layered on top of the plugin. Yoast has integrated AI-assisted meta description and title generation into its recent versions.
Rank Math integrates natively with Surfer SEO for content scoring - if you use Surfer for topical analysis, you can see your Surfer score directly in the WordPress editor alongside Rank Math's own analysis. Yoast does not have an equivalent native Surfer integration.
Neither plugin replaces a proper content research workflow. If you are generating articles with AI tools and then optimizing them in WordPress, the plugin validates the on-page elements - it does not replace the research and writing process upstream.
Rank Math Instant Indexing
One Rank Math capability with no Yoast equivalent: Instant Indexing, which uses Google's Indexing API and Bing's submission API to push URLs directly to search engines for faster crawling. For sites that publish time-sensitive content, this is a practical advantage that Yoast does not offer.
Performance: The File Size Difference
This is the most underreported angle in most comparisons.
Yoast SEO has approximately 87,200 lines of code and a file size of around 7.18MB. Rank Math has approximately 51,300 lines of code and a file size of around 2.85MB. That is a 60% difference in file size.
For most sites running modern hosting, this difference is minimal in practice. Where it starts to matter: high-traffic sites where every millisecond of page load time affects Core Web Vitals scores, shared hosting environments with limited server resources, and sites already running multiple heavy plugins.
Both plugins allow you to disable unused modules, which reduces their active footprint. But the baseline difference is real. If your site is already optimized for speed and you are trying to minimize plugin overhead, Rank Math starts from a lighter position. Pairing either plugin with a technical SEO checklist review will identify whether performance is actually a constraint for your site before you make the switch.
Pricing at Scale
For a single site, the pricing difference between Rank Math Pro and Yoast Premium is small. For agencies or developers managing multiple sites, it is significant.
| Rank Math Pro | Yoast Premium | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 site | ~$99/year | $99/year |
| 5 sites | ~$99/year (unlimited) | ~$495/year |
| 10 sites | ~$99/year (unlimited) | ~$990/year |
| WooCommerce SEO | Included free | €178.80/year extra |
| Local SEO | Included Pro | $79/year extra |
Rank Math Pro covers unlimited personal sites at a flat rate. Yoast charges per site, and adds significant cost if you need WooCommerce or Local SEO features. For anyone managing more than two or three WordPress sites, the economics favor Rank Math by a wide margin.
This is where the "Rank Math wins" conclusion in most reviews originates - and it is a fair conclusion for that use case. AI SEO tools at the platform level have a similar split: tools priced per seat get expensive at scale, while flat-rate tools are dramatically cheaper for agencies.
The Green Light Myth
Both plugins give you a content score. Yoast uses a red/yellow/green traffic light. Rank Math uses a 0-100 score. Both are optimized-for-publishing guidance systems, not ranking guarantees.
Here is what the score actually measures: whether you have included the focus keyword in specific locations (title, meta description, first paragraph, alt text, URL) and whether basic readability checks pass. It does not measure topical coverage, content depth, E-E-A-T signals, or how well your page actually answers the searcher's intent.
Chasing a green light on a page that covers a topic shallowly produces content that is technically optimized and topically thin. Google's ranking systems care about the latter more than the former. The score is useful as a checklist for technical on-page elements. It is not a proxy for content quality or ranking probability.
This is one reason I have not felt pressure to switch from Yoast to Rank Math despite the feature gap: the score either plugin gives me is the least important part of my publishing process. The best SEO software for content quality evaluation is SERP analysis, not plugin scoring.
Yoast's Acquisition: Worth Knowing
In 2021, Yoast was acquired by Newfold Digital, the parent company of Bluehost, HostGator, and Web.com. For a plugin with 10+ million active installs, this is relevant context. Product decisions at Yoast are now made within a large hosting conglomerate rather than by an independent team.
This does not make Yoast a worse plugin - it has continued to receive regular updates and remains one of the most actively maintained content optimization tools in the WordPress ecosystem. But it is a consideration for anyone making a long-term platform decision, particularly larger organizations that want to understand who controls the roadmap.
Rank Math is owned by MyThemeShop's spin-off entity. It remains independently operated.
Migrating From Yoast to Rank Math
If you decide to switch, Rank Math includes a one-click import tool that pulls your existing Yoast metadata - titles, descriptions, schema settings, and redirects - into Rank Math's format. The process takes a few minutes for most sites.
Rank Math has grown from zero to 3 million installs in six years - a rate that took Yoast considerably longer to match at the same stage.
The steps: install Rank Math alongside Yoast, run the import wizard (Settings > Status & Tools > Import & Export), select Yoast as the source, import all data, verify a sample of posts to confirm metadata transferred correctly, then deactivate and remove Yoast.
Preserve your redirects before switching - if you have built up a library of 301 redirects in Yoast Premium, export them first and verify they import correctly. For sites with complex URL structures or large redirect libraries, test on a staging environment before migrating production.
Which Plugin Should You Use?
Use Rank Math if:
- You are starting a new WordPress site and want the most capable free tier
- You manage multiple sites - the unlimited site licensing at flat cost is the strongest argument for Rank Math
- You run a WooCommerce store - Rank Math includes WooCommerce SEO features that Yoast charges extra for
- You want GA4 and GSC data visible inside WordPress without additional plugins
- Site speed and plugin overhead are a priority - Rank Math's smaller footprint is the lighter starting point
Use Yoast if:
- You are already using it and it is working - switching carries migration risk with no guaranteed ranking benefit
- Readability analysis is important to your content workflow - Yoast's Flesch scoring and writing quality checks are genuinely better
- Your team is non-technical and benefits from the familiar traffic light UX that Yoast has refined over 15 years
- You are on a single site where per-site pricing is not a factor
The honest answer for anyone already using Yoast and not running into specific limitations: there is no SEO ranking benefit from switching. Neither plugin gives you a ranking advantage over the other - they validate on-page elements, they do not determine whether your content deserves to rank. If Yoast is working and your team knows it, the switching cost is not justified by feature parity at the premium level.
I have stayed on Yoast for that reason. The gap in the free tier is real, but I am not on the free tier. At the premium level, the tools are closer than the feature lists suggest for a content-focused site. If I were starting fresh or managing a WooCommerce store, I would start with Rank Math.
Common Questions
Is Rank Math better than Yoast for SEO? Neither plugin gives you a direct ranking advantage over the other. Both validate on-page technical elements - title tags, meta descriptions, schema, internal links - competently. Rank Math's free tier is more generous. Yoast's readability analysis is better. The ranking outcome depends on your content, not your plugin.
Does switching from Yoast to Rank Math improve rankings? No. There is no evidence that switching plugins improves rankings. Both plugins meet the same technical standards. If your site is ranking well with Yoast, switching will not improve performance. The only valid reasons to switch are feature-specific (you need unlimited site licensing, better WooCommerce integration, or the GA4 dashboard) or cost-related (agencies paying per-site Yoast fees).
Is Rank Math free good enough? For most sites, yes. The Rank Math free tier includes everything the average WordPress site needs: five focus keywords, full schema library, redirects, 404 monitoring, and analytics integration. The Pro upgrade becomes relevant for agencies (unlimited sites) or sites needing advanced local SEO and WooCommerce features at scale.
Can you use both Yoast and Rank Math at the same time? You can install both, but you should only have one active at a time. Running two SEO plugins simultaneously creates duplicate meta tags, conflicting schema output, and sitemap conflicts. Rank Math's import wizard handles the migration in one direction (Yoast to Rank Math) cleanly.
What is a good Rank Math SEO score? Rank Math targets a score of 80+ as its "Good" threshold. A score above 90 is flagged as "Excellent." In practice, the score reflects technical on-page compliance, not content quality. A page scoring 95 on Rank Math can rank poorly if the content does not serve the searcher's intent. Treat the score as a checklist, not a ranking predictor.
Final Verdict
Rank Math wins on raw features, pricing at scale, and the free tier. The file size advantage matters on performance-sensitive sites. Instant Indexing has no Yoast equivalent. For agencies, multi-site operators, and WooCommerce stores, Rank Math is the stronger choice by a clear margin.
Yoast holds its own on readability analysis, brand familiarity, and the weight of 15 years of ecosystem integration. For content teams where writing quality feedback matters, and for sites already invested in Yoast at the premium tier, switching is not a priority.
The SEO impact of either choice is effectively zero if your content strategy is right. Both plugins handle what plugins should handle: technical on-page validation. Neither replaces a content research process or the judgment calls that determine whether a page actually deserves to rank. For the browser-side layer alongside your WordPress plugin, Chrome SEO extensions add real-time checks while you browse the SERP before you write.
If you want SEO content that starts from live keyword and SERP research before a word is written - regardless of which plugin you use to publish it - that is what Nest Content does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Neither gives a direct ranking advantage. Rank Math free tier is more generous; Yoast has better readability analysis. Ranking depends on content quality, not the plugin.

Written by
Robin Da SilvaFounder - Nest Content
Having been a Software Engineer for more than eight years of building web apps and creating technology frameworks, my work cuts through just technical details to solve real business problems, especially in SaaS companies.
Create SEO content that ranks
Join 200+ brands using Nest Content to publish optimized articles in minutes.
Related Articles
Surfer SEO Review 2026: Is It Worth It? (Honest Assessment)
Honest Surfer SEO review based on 213 user reviews and independent data testing. The green score trap, real pricing, who it's worth it for, and who should skip.
Ahrefs Review 2026: Features, Pricing, and What 300+ Users Actually Say
Honest Ahrefs review based on 3 years of daily use and 306 Trustpilot reviews. Real pricing, the credit limit problem, rank tracking limitations, and who Ahrefs is actually worth it for.
Semrush Review 2026: Features, Pricing, and the Billing Controversy
Honest Semrush review based on free tier testing and 1,200+ user reviews. Features, pricing, the Trustpilot controversy, and who Semrush is actually worth it for.